RSS
Visae Patentes | 12. Dezember 2010 — ... ). The Board thus took the position that, for different reasons, both claim 1 and claim 10 fail to define statutory subject matter as required under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Criticism: In the meantime the BPAI decision has received some attention from US patent bloggers. While Karen G. Hazzah of All T…
Visae Patentes | 17. November 2010 — Signature of Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603) In early October 2010, the US Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) issued three interesting decisions relating to computer-implemented inventions in the US, namely (i.) Ex parte MacKenzie, App. No. 10/183,900, (ii.) Ex parte Kelkar, App…
Visae Patentes | 17. August 2010 — ... recently, the USPTO has published the BPAI decision ex parte Givens as an ... element of the invention. Another interesting BPAI opinion on claims interpretation, this time ... doctrine of "broadest reasonable interpretation", the BPAI found that the claims encompass [] ... 's Gray on Clai…
Visae Patentes | 17. August 2010 — ... recently, the USPTO has published the BPAI decision ex parte Givens as an ... element of the invention. Another interesting BPAI opinion on claims interpretation, this time ... doctrine of "broadest reasonable interpretation", the BPAI found that the claims encompass [] ... 's Gray on Clai…
Visae Patentes | 17. Juli 2010 — ... US Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) has decided its first decision after the ... case ex parte Proudler (Hewlett Packard) the BPAI rejected all of the pending claims under ... considered non-eligible. Secondly, US Examiners, the BPAI, and US courts seem to th…
