Markenpiraterie in China
MarkenBlog | 8. November 2005 — Nach Angaben der chinesischen Regierung waren im letzten Jahr lediglich bei 10,6% aller untersuchten Markenrechtsverletzungen …
On April 21, 2010, China's Supreme People’s Court issued a first study (white paper) on "Property Protection by Chinese Courts in 2009", as e.g. reported here. The paper not only provides a review of IPR enforcement in China in 2009 but also a retrospect on the development of the Chinese IP system in the past 30 years. The bilingual (Chinese and English) paper may be obtained here. As explained on China Law Update, China started its IPR protection system in the late 1970s and early 1980s during China’s reform. Judicial protection of IPR in Chinese courts started from zero, but has now developed into a specialized system with Chinese characteristics. The White Paper on IPR enforcement signifies the importance of IPR in China today. Chinese courts provide judicial protection for IPR through civil, administrative and criminal procedures. According to the White Paper, from 1985 to 2009, Chinese courts have received and rendered decisions for many IPR cases including: 166,408 civil cases, 6,387 administrative cases, and 14,509 criminal cases. In this respect, the paper lists a number of issues the Chinese courts have focussed on in the past 30 years: Expanded their functions and powers in IPR protection; Enlarged the scope of judicial protection for IPR property; Increased the level of judicial protection for IPR; Enhanced the effectiveness of judicial protection for IPR; Improved the judicial system in IPR protection; and Improved the capacity in providing judicial protection for IPR. Further to that, the Supreme People's Court's claims four central achievements as a result of its past work: The judicial system became a leading force in China's IP protection due to fair and efficient adjudication of intellectual property cases; Judicial IP Protection has served the needs of socioeconomic development by ensuring th…
» Vollständiger ArtikelErschienen 28. April 2010 auf http://www.visaepatentes.com.
MarkenBlog | 8. November 2005 — Nach Angaben der chinesischen Regierung waren im letzten Jahr lediglich bei 10,6% aller untersuchten Markenrechtsverletzungen …
Verfassungsblog | 15. Februar 2012 — The European Union could not be imagined without respect for fundamental rights by both the EU itself and its member states. It…
Verfassungsblog | 30. Januar 2012 — By RUIYI LI On the 26th of November 2011, the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPCC) announced the first set of ‘guiding case…
Die neue Mehrsprachigkeit | 11. Januar 2006 — Everyone has probably heard that following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 the USA adopted legislation requiring airlin…
Transblawg | 2. Oktober 2009 — In the Times Online, Richard Susskind describes the IT systems used or to be used in future in the new Supreme Court. So the new b…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 1. August 2005 — MAG - Washington. The European Arrest Warrant was to be implemented in German law as an EU-wide arrest and surrender warrant. Th…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 23. Juni 2005 — CK - Washington. The Berlin Department of Justice web site lists areas of the law in its topics page, on the left, in the follow…
Transblawg | 1. Dezember 2008 — Citation Patterns of the German Federal Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal of England and Wales by Mathias M. Siems University …
Handakte WebLAWg | 14. September 2008 — I really like english-language blogs that cover a particular aspect of international law. One such blog is China Law Insight, p…
Archivalia | 2. Februar 2012 — http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/2012/02/protection-of-photographs-in-french.html Interessant: Finally, in 1985 the distinction bew…
On April 20, 2010, China’s Supreme People’s Court published its first Intellectual Property Protection by Chinese Courts in 2009 White Pap