US-Urheberrecht

Eine interessante Entscheidung eines US-Bundesgerichtes (Moberg v. 33T LLC et al., 2009 WL 3182606 (D. N.J. Oct. 6, 2009)) betreff Urheberschutz und Klagemöglichkeit in den USA; dem vorliegenden Fall lagen Fotografien zugrunde, die auf einer deutschen Webseite veröffentlicht worden waren. Der Fotograf wollte nun gegen deren unberechtige Verwendung in den USA vorgehen. Im folgenden eine Veröffentlichung auf der Webseite www.monday.com. Wenn Verfahrensdokumente gewünscht werden, bitte an NIETZER & HÄUSLER wenden.

Autoren: Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz

United States: Were Photos Published On German Website Simultaneously Published In U.S. For Purposes Of U.S. Copyright Law? In a case addressing the intersection of the Copyright Act, the Berne Convention, and the Internet, a federal court in New Jersey has held that photographs published on a German website were not simultaneously published in the U.S. under U.S. copyright law. As a result, the photographs were not “United States work(s)” and the photographer could advance a copyright infringement action without first registering his copyright in the U.S.

Hakan Moberg first published the photographs — a series of studies of a woman titled “Urban Gregorian I-IX” — on a German gallery website in 2004. Subsequently, five of Moberg’s photographs appeared on three website design company websites as free graphics available to the design company clients. Two of the defendant’s websites were registered to a Delaware corporation.

When the defendants failed to promptly remove his photographs, Moberg filed a complaint in the U.S. alleging copyright infringement under the U.S. Copyright Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

The defendants asked the court to dismiss the case. They argued, among other things, that the court lacked jurisdiction because the photographer had not registered his copyright in the photographs with the U.S. Copyright office. Section 411(a) of the Copyright Act states that “no action for infringement of the copyright in any work shall be instituted until registration of the copyright claim has been made [or rejected] in accordance with this title.” For purposes of section 411, a “work is a United States work only if … in the case of a published work, the work is first published …

» Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches

Themen: Copyright Infringement , Digital Millennium Copyright Act

Erschienen 26. März 2010 auf http://www.usa-recht.de.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

US-Copyright-Fristen

Archivalia | 4. Januar 2009 — Keine andere zivilisierte Nation leistet sich ein so kompliziertes Regelungswerk bei den Urheberrechtsfristen wie die USA. Auf ein…

US-Marken- und Urheberrecht

USA Recht | 15. Oktober 2011 — Nachfolgend ein kleiner Überblick zum US-Gewerblichen Rechtsschutz, Auszug aus der September / Oktober 2011 Ausgabe German Ame…

Fotografienschutz im französischen Recht

Archivalia | 2. Februar 2012 — http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/2012/02/protection-of-photographs-in-french.html Interessant: Finally, in 1985 the distinction bew…

Paper and ePaper Fees

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 12. Februar 2007 — CK - Washington.   A Cologne court decided that an author earns separate fees for an article published in two formats: a printed p…

Third-Party Images in German Group Blogs

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 14. November 2009 — CK - Washington.   Who is liable for copyright violations when community blog articles include pictures supplied by a contributing…

Copyright Liability Without Link

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 25. Mai 2010 — CK - Washington.   In Berlin and Hamburg, maintaining a copy of a copyrighted work on your server or internet space, such as a map…

Copyright Office Published Specialty Station List and Requests Comments

Handakte WebLAWg | 15. Juni 2007 — The Copyright Office has published a final list of stations listed in affidavits sent to the Copyright Office in which the owne…

Google Cache is legal, Nevada court rules

Aktenvermerk | 26. Januar 2006 — A district court in Nevada brought down the ruling yesterday, deciding that Google was not breaking the law because it honors…

Sweat of the Brow: HTML

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 5. August 2005 — CK - Washington.   Converting a client's ads from a text processor file to an HTML file, without more, is sweat of the brow-type w…

New Rules for Quotes and Samples

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 18. August 2007 — CC - Washington. The recent amendments to the German copyright statute which were passed by the diet in Berlin in July 2007, Secon…