United States: Supreme Court Provides Guidance for Businesses Wishing to Avoid Unfriendly State Courts

03 June 2010,Article by C.R. Wright (Fisher & Phillips LLP):

Businesses often wish to avoid litigation in unfriendly state court forums. For that reason it is important to know when removal is possible so that cases can be transferred automatically from state court to federal court, where judges are appointed for life rather than periodically elected by local citizens. Until recently, there was no way to be certain about whether removal would be possible because the federal circuit courts did not all agree about how the law regarding corporate citizenship for purposes of removal jurisdiction should be applied.

On February 23, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court clarified when businesses can remove a lawsuit from state court and have it heard in the friendlier forum of federal court.1 The ruling dealt with what is called “diversity jurisdiction” and is seen as highly favorable for businesses, particularly for large companies conducting business in multiple states because it will make it easier for them to know when they will…

» Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches

Themen: Litigation , Diversity

Erschienen 5. Juni 2010 auf http://www.usa-recht.de.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

German Top Courts

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 25. Oktober 2008 — CK - Washington.   America may have more supreme courts than Germany, but Germany operates more top courts at the federal level. H…

New Batch of Supreme Judges

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 17. März 2005 — CK - Washington. Today, the federal election committee for the judiciary, Bundeswahlausschuss, elected several batches of justices…

M&A’ Red Flags for the United States #1

USA Recht | 3. Juni 2010 — Management may find the current environment tempting to purchase companies out of bankruptcy. Thus, we like to draw the reade…

New Supreme Court Justices

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 6. Mai 2010 — CK - Washington.   The replacement of one justice at the Supreme Court in the United States is a major affair with often huge long…

Bundesgerichtshof IN Karlsruhe: Pleading Jurisdictional Defects

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 22. August 2005 — CK - Washington.   In a victory for foreign plaintiffs, the eighth civil division of the Federal Supreme Court, Bundesgerichtshof,…

OH Supreme Court ruling gives grandparents visitation rights

Handakte WebLAWg | 15. Januar 2006 — [Via JURIST] Leading Monday’s states brief, the Ohio Supreme Court unanimously ruled [PDF text] today that grandparent visitati…

U.S. Courts Should be Reserved for U.S. Cases

USA Recht | 5. Oktober 2010 — To most people, the notion that a country’s legal system should only decide cases regarding actions occurring in that country i…

Supreme Court: Fax Receipt, no Refund

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 15. März 2009 — CK - Washington.   Recently, we listed the German federal supreme courts. Next to the Constitutional Supreme Court, Bundesverfassu…

United States: Post-Morrison, State Law Rather Than Federal Supports Claims By Non-U.S. Investors For Alleged Securities Fraud

USA Recht | 18. Februar 2012 — Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP We have been following the law’s development since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in…

Court of Appeal and Bundesgerichtshof citation patterns

Transblawg | 1. Dezember 2008 — Citation Patterns of the German Federal Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal of England and Wales by Mathias M. Siems University …