Sweat of the Brow: HTML
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 5. August 2005 — CK - Washington. Converting a client's ads from a text processor file to an HTML file, without more, is sweat of the brow-type w…
CK - Washington. A decision on software law by the German Supreme Court in Civil Matters, Bundesgerichtshof, in Karlsruhe is the subject of Arne Trautmann's careful analysis in the Law Blog on October 10, 2005. The decision of March 3, 2005 in the matter IZR111/02, a/k/a Fash 2000, involves the requirements for a transfer of a copyrightable work and specifically a complex a computer program. The court considers the program of copyrightable quality which is not the standard for all software under German copyright law. The key issue is whether a program that has been coded by one programmer--and after a transfer to a corporation--has been added to by other programmers, requires the consent of all three programmers for the further transfer from the estate of the then-bankrupt corporation to another party. The court examined the issues of the rules of construction of contracts and, in particular, of distinguishing a co-authored work from an original work made by its creator and enhanced with modifications and adaptations made by others. Trautmann clarifies the main conclusions of the court. The transfer of a joint work will require the joint consents of all creators, none of which may be unreasonably refused. By contrast, if there is an original work plus enhancements, the original creator controls the transfer. Whether the programmers of the enhancements have any control depends on their authority to modify the work. These are factual issues which the court sent back to the lower court to examine. That court will need to determine whether the coders involved after the orginal creation subsumed their contributions to a common overriding development concept, in which case they may be deemed joint authors with the original programmer. German American Law Journal :: Washington USA
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 5. August 2005 — CK - Washington. Converting a client's ads from a text processor file to an HTML file, without more, is sweat of the brow-type w…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 29. November 2008 — CK - Washington. A two-second rhythmic stretch, sampled by musicians from another musicians' recording, triggered litigation for…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 31. Juli 2005 — CK - Washington. An employee created a software program for his employer. He performed the service, in part, at his home office …
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 12. April 2011 — CK -Washington. Time and again, we note that some lower German courts fail to understand the internet while the Supreme Court fo…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 23. August 2004 — CK - Washington. Recht-in.de published a recent decision, IV ZR 135/03, dated July 7, 2004, by the German Supreme Court on the v…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 12. April 2005 — JN - Marl. Most business software solutions require servicing to keep pace with new developments and changing demands. However, …
Transblawg | 23. Januar 2007 — The German Auswärtiges Amt long since published a list of German court names and their translations into English, French and Sp…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 22. August 2005 — CK - Washington. In a victory for foreign plaintiffs, the eighth civil division of the Federal Supreme Court, Bundesgerichtshof,…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 6. Mai 2010 — CK - Washington. The replacement of one justice at the Supreme Court in the United States is a major affair with often huge long…
USA Recht | 26. März 2010 — Eine interessante Entscheidung eines US-Bundesgerichtes (Moberg v. 33T LLC et al., 2009 WL 3182606 (D. N.J. Oct. 6, 2009)) betr…