Torts and Arbitration

CK - Washington.   An American arbitration clause provided by contract for retail securities transactions does not cover tort claims arising under the German statute for investor protection, the Düsseldorf appellate court decided on December 20, 2007 in the matter I-6 U 225/06. The decision does not name the American brokerage but states that it is a major internationally active entity operating in conjunction with brokers in Germany who produce customers. The dispute centers on options trades, kick-backs and churning in securities accounts in violation of German law. The court does not mention which state law applies to the contract. It analyzes the German federal conflicts of laws rules codified in the EGBGB code and then applies German law. The unenforceability of the arbitration clause derives from the fact that the German statute for the protection of investors requires commercial parties or an agreement reached after the tort occurred for…

» Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Germany

Erschienen 19. Februar 2008 auf http://galj.info.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Bundesgerichtshof IN Karlsruhe: Pleading Jurisdictional Defects

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 22. August 2005 — CK - Washington.   In a victory for foreign plaintiffs, the eighth civil division of the Federal Supreme Court, Bundesgerichtshof,…

Schiedsgerichtsklausel: US-Schiedsgerichtsklausel

USA Recht | 22. Mai 2010 — Musterklausel / Entwurf einer Standard US.Schiedsgerichstklausel (American Bar Association) Any controversy or claim aris…

German Court Applies E.U. Rule to U.S. Airlines

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 20. Januar 2011 — CK - Washington.   U.S. airlines are subject to E.U. rules for compensation and accommodation for passengers suffering flight dela…

German Fear of Anonymity

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 18. Februar 2008 — CK - Washington.   Another nail in the wireless Internet coffin. By summary order, the Düsseldorf appellate court announced that W…

Germany Sovereignty: German Sovereignty Lost in 1945?

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 31. Oktober 2006 — CK - Washington.   Did Germany's surrender in 1945 trigger its loss of sovereign immunity so that Germany may be sued in American …

Recognition of US Bankruptcy Procedure

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 5. August 2010 — KB - Washington.   The German Supreme Court in Karlsruhe, Bundesgerichtshof, ruled on October 13, 2009 on the recognition of Ameri…

German False Light Jurisdiction Extends to NYT

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 3. März 2010 — CK - Washington.   The New York Times has some 14000 German subscribers, registers German readers separately and markets its onlin…

Gerglisch in German Courts

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 10. Januar 2010 — CK - Washington.   Gerglisch will become an official language in German courts. Fearing the sound of international litigation bein…

Beware the German Domain Rule

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 18. Juli 2008 — CK - Washington.   In the dim ages of the Internet, trademark law and domain law were two separate branches of the law. Trademark …

FSIA and Italian Enforcement

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 27. Dezember 2008 — CK - Washington.   A German-Italian dispute related by the International Court of Justice in a press release may eventually affect…

German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch
Berliner, Corcoran&Rowe
Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, I-6 U 224/06