The Habermas/Luhmann-debate
am 30.09.2006 von http://log.handakte.de/Usually regarded as a 1970s phenomenon, this article demonstrates that the debate between Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann continued until Luhmann’s death in 1998, and that the development of the two theorists’ positions during the 1980s and 1990s was characterised by convergence rather than by divergence. In the realm of legal theory, the article suggests, convergence advanced …
Dr. Robert Agnew zur Strain Theory in Criminal Justice
criminologia / Auf Youtube gibt es das Video einer Vorlesung von Dr. Robert Agnew zur Strain Theory in Criminal Justice - gehalten in 2005 an der Eastern Kentucky University - College of Justice and Safety - anzuschauen. (herzlichen Dank an Nils für den Hinwei…
Habermas vs. Fest: Verfügung bestätigt
Handakte WebLAWg / Die von Jürgen Habermas beim LG Hamburg erwirkte Einstweilige Verfügung gegen die Joachim-Fest-Autobiografie Ich nicht ist nach einer mündlichen Verhandlung durch Urteil bestätigt worden. “Der vom Rowohlt Verlag eingelegte Widerspruch hatt…
Workshop on Commons Theory for Young Scholars
Handakte WebLAWg / Im Mai 2007 veranstaltet das Max-Planck-Institut zur Erforschung von Gemeinschaftsgütern - gemeinsam mit dem Center for Internet and Society der Stanford Law School - einen “Workshop on Commons Theory for Young Scholars“. Dabei werden j…
Das Gelöbnis
Jurabilis / So I did something today for the very last time in my life. Im publishing a comment in the Minnesota Law Review about an article by Brett Frischmann titled An Economic Theory of Infrastructure. His is a great article; I was happy to write the commen…
Wall Street Journal on Blogs and Law Reviews
Law & Justice / Brandt Goldstein at the Wall Street Journal has an article today addressing the current debate in the legal academy regarding the relative merits and demerits of law reviews and academic blogs. He challenges the legitimacy of law reviews as much as…
New Forum: Debate Europe
Law & Justice / The EU has opened a new website Debate Europe. It is part of the EUs Plan D – where D stands for Dialogue, Debate and Democracy. Plan D is the Commissions contribution to the period of reflection on the future of the EU, which was called for by He…
© 2004-2008 JuraBlogs | Impressum
