Respondent not a cat / Partei behauptet, eine Katze zu sein

Respondent maintains that it is a cat, that is, a well-known carnivorous quadruped which has long been domesticated. However, it is equally well-known that the common cat, whose scientific name is Felis domesticus, cannot speak or read or write. Thus, a common cat could not have submitted the Response (or even have registered the disputed domain name). Therefore, either Respondent is a different species of cat, such as the one that stars in the motion picture “Cat From Outer Space,” or Respondent’s assertion regarding its being a cat is incorrect.

Decision

Via Markenblog

Elsewhere, on dogs in Austria, Juristisches und Sonstiges, from Der Kurier.

I suppose one could compare the language in Austrian and English courts here, although the Austrian language did not come from the judge.