Plants Due Diligence

CB - Washington.   On February 14, 2006, the Supreme Court in Karlsruhe, Bundesgerichtshof, decided a conflict relating to the plant protection statute, Sortenschutzgesetz, of December 11, 1985, BGBl. I, p.2170, as amended on January 21, 2005, BGBl. I, p.146 et seq. The dispute involves the defendant s importation of components for plants that violate plaintiff s intellectual property in such plants which had been registered with the Bundessortenamt, the agency in Hannover charged with registering material covered by the statute. The court upheld in the matter X ZR 93/04 the decision of the Karlsruhe court of appeals wich prevents the defendant from marketing plants named Melanie and Amethyst and awards damages to the plaintiff for the infringement of its rights. The defendant had purchased reproduction material from France and the Netherlands for use in Germany without verifying whether the product is registered there. The court explained that a merchant trading in foreign products bears the burden of determining possible violations because there is the possibility that foreign vendor may not have determined the existence and extent of domestically registered rights. The domestic importer and reseller may not merely rely on the fact that a foreign vendor makes the material available for export sales, and the importer must perform some due diligence with respect to domestic intellectual property rights. German American Law Journal :: Washington USA

  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Hannover , Supreme Court , Intellectual Property , Conflict , Due Diligence

Erschienen 28. April 2006 auf http://galj.info.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Double Trouble Hits Spammer

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 21. Dezember 2006 — KR - Washington.   Spam EMails violate various German statutes. Most commonly, a cause of action is based on the Unfair Competitio…

Foreign Trademark Domestically Protected

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 26. Juli 2009 — CK - Washington.   Despite the fact that an unregistered trademark is used in Germany, a conflicting mark may be registered with t…

Court Expands Jurisdiction

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 5. Oktober 2005 — CK - Washington.   Today, the Cologne Circuit published a press release in the matter 16 U 36/04 explaining its ruling on an inter…

Internet Jurisdiction of German Courts

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 30. März 2011 — CK - Washington.   On March 30, 2011, the German Supreme Court for Civil Matters, Bundesgerichtshof, released a press statement to…

Remedy Effectively Waived

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 9. Dezember 2007 — CK - Washington.   A criminal defendant can effectively waive all rights to an appeal and is then barred from a review by the Supr…

Perfume Trademarks

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 21. April 2006 — HG - Washington.   According to Section 19 of the German Trademark Statute, Markengesetz, a trademark owner may demand information…

Recognition of US Bankruptcy Procedure

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 5. August 2010 — KB - Washington.   The German Supreme Court in Karlsruhe, Bundesgerichtshof, ruled on October 13, 2009 on the recognition of Ameri…

Royalties on Printers

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 8. Dezember 2007 — CK - Washington.   In 2001, the German Supreme Court in Karlsruhe, Bundesgerichtshof, ruled in favor of copyright royalties payabl…

U.S. Complaint to be Served

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 9. Februar 2007 — CK - Washington.   On January 24, 2007, the federal supreme court for constitutional matters, Bundesverfassungsgericht, in Karlsru…

Paper on Lawyer

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 9. April 2006 — CK - Washington.   Rechtblog reprints an excerpt from a press release of April 7, 2006 by the Karlsruhe Court of Appeals regarding…

Der Bundesgerichtshof
German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch
Sortenschutzgesetz (Deutschland)
Startseite Bundessortenamt
recht-in.de - Urteile | H�ndler beachtet jedenfalls dann nicht erforderliche Sorgfalt, wenn er Erzeugnis in den Verkehr bringt, ohne begr�ndeterma�en annehmen zu d�rfen, dass notwendige Pr�fung auf Verletzung absoluter Rechte Dr

recht-in.de ...ihr Tor zum Recht. Mit einer der umfangreichsten Urteils-, Gesetzes- und News-Datenbank und vielen Suchfunktionen.">