Perfume Trademarks

HG - Washington.   According to Section 19 of the German Trademark Statute, Markengesetz, a trademark owner may demand information from any infringer of the trademark about the origin and distributor of the infringing goods. The Supreme Court of the Federal Republic of Germany, Bundesgerichtshof, decided in its Parfümtestkäufe decision of February 23, 2006, docket number 1 ZR 27/03, that this rule applies to goods shipped outside but distributed inside the European Union. The plaintiff, a German perfume distributor with trademarks such as Joop and Jil Sander, had distributed goods outside the European Union, mainly in the Asian and U. S. markets. The defendant, another German distributor who maintained no business relationships with the plaintiff and thus was not permitted to use the trademarks purchased these goods, had sold and stored them in Germany. The Court ruled that the defendant must reveal not only information about the activities giving rise to the infringement, but also about acts similar to such activities. In addition, the Court clarified that the plaintiff's claim to force the destruction of such goods if (a) the infringement cannot be corrected otherwise, and (b) the enforcement of this claim is not unreasonable, normally depends on the identification of the injuring party's degree of liability. German American Law Journal :: Washington USA

  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Bundesgerichtshof , European Union , Supreme Court , HG

Erschienen 21. April 2006 auf http://galj.info.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Freight from China: IP Liability

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 7. November 2007 — CK - Washington.   A freight forwarder is not contributorily liable, under German trademark law, for the violation of trademarks b…

Beware the German Domain Rule

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 18. Juli 2008 — CK - Washington.   In the dim ages of the Internet, trademark law and domain law were two separate branches of the law. Trademark …

Pleading Jurisdictional Defects

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 22. August 2005 — CK - Washington.   In a victory for foreign plaintiffs, the eighth civil division of the Federal Supreme Court, Bundesgerichtshof,…

Internet Auction and Trademark

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 2. Mai 2008 — CK - Washington.   After a recent change in the law on online provider liability, the German Supreme Court confirmed its prior vie…

Plants Due Diligence

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 28. April 2006 — CB - Washington.   On February 14, 2006, the Supreme Court in Karlsruhe, Bundesgerichtshof, decided a conflict relating to the pla…

Germany Sovereignty: German Sovereignty Lost in 1945?

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 31. Oktober 2006 — CK - Washington.   Did Germany's surrender in 1945 trigger its loss of sovereign immunity so that Germany may be sued in American …

Usa Wikipedia: Wikipedia - TRO Set Aside

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 10. Februar 2006 — HF - Washington.   On February 9, 2006, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, a Berlin civil court, set aside the temporary restraining orde…

No Clean Hands in Competition

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 7. Mai 2005 — CK - Washington.   Equity requires clean hands of a party that raises a claim against a party not to have violated the law in resp…

No Assumption of GDR Liability

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 29. Januar 2006 — CK - Washington.   The Federal Republic of Germany did not assume all liabilities of the now-extinct German Democratic Republic, a…

Forum Owner Liable for Visitor Action

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 26. Oktober 2005 — CK - Washington.   German courts are pushing internet operators ever harder. A June 6, 2005 decision by the Winsen a.d. Luhe court…

German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch
I ZR 27/03