Online Sale and Shipping Charge

ACP - Washington.   The Appellate Court of Hamburg, Oberlandesgericht Hamburg, decided recently that internet sellers need to cleary identify shipping costs charged to buyers on the specific product page; docket number Az. 5 U 128/04. The Court held it insufficient to merely post a link, an asterisk and the words More Info that lead to another page which, in turn, details additional shipping charges, or would force the buyer to scroll down to a legend of shipping charges. An advertisement by a commercial Internet seller offering ISDN computer cards for 69.00 Euros triggerd the dispute. Next to the product, a link labeled More Info led to shipping fees at the bottom of the page. The page also featured an order button. The court of appeals noted that the structure of the web site violates §1(6) of the price regulations, Preisangabenverordnung - PAngV. The site design misleads the average costumer who does not expect additional price information by clicking on a more info link that is separate from the order button. The court believes that the costumer anticipates more technical information by clicking on an information link. Finally, the Court ratified the common practice of posting deep links on sales sites that leads to another page with applicable price and shipping information; that design would not mislead the consumer.

  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Oberlandesgericht Hamburg
Rechtsgebiet: Wettbewerbsrecht

Erschienen 14. März 2005 auf http://galj.info.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Lotteriespiel mit 50 %

Das interessiert doch wieder keine Sau... | 12. Juni 2007 — Okay, kann ja alles seine Ordung haben. Aber ob man das wirklich ausprobieren sollte? I will explain to you step by step ho…

Bringing the Basic Price into Your Online Shop

IT-Recht Kanzlei - Nachrichten | 19. Oktober 2009 — As previously reported, in the article: "Basic Price and End Price go Together", the Federal Court of Justice ruled that the …

Stop the Impressum Craze

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 4. November 2006 — CK - Washington.   The Supreme Court in Karlsruhe displayed common sense when it scrutinized the scope of statutory obligations to…

Market-based instruments for international aviation and shipping as a source of climate finance

LEXEGESE | 18. Januar 2012 — ● By Keen, Michael, Ian Parry and Jon Strand ● The international aviation and maritime sectors today enjoy relatively favorabl…

Statutory Legal Fees

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 2. Juli 2007 — J.G - Washington.  In Germany, legal fees consist of attorney fees for out of court actions and litigation and of court costs. A l…

Bargain at Auction Legal

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 29. September 2007 — CK - Washington.   On September 28, 2007, the Pforzheim criminal conviction of an online auction buyer of equipment at a price too…

New York Criminal Court Search

Handakte WebLAWg | 24. April 2005 — This is an internal page of the New York State Unified Court System, which provides case searches and calendars for criminal ca…

M&A’ Red Flags for the United States #1

USA Recht | 3. Juni 2010 — Management may find the current environment tempting to purchase companies out of bankruptcy. Thus, we like to draw the reade…

Supreme Court: Fax Receipt, no Refund

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 15. März 2009 — CK - Washington.   Recently, we listed the German federal supreme courts. Next to the Constitutional Supreme Court, Bundesverfassu…

HCI Schiffsfonds: Sechs Insolvenzen in nur einer Woche

bankundkapitalmarktrecht | 13. Februar 2012 — Totalverlust droht für Anleger der betroffenen HCI Fonds Shipping Select 26 und Shipping Select 28 Haufenweise schlechte Nachricht…

Stadt Hamburg:          Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht
Alexander C. P�hler :: Erfahrungsberichte und News aus Washington, DC
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit
Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg, Urteil vom 03.02.2005, 5 U 128/04