EMail Published, Protected Like Letter
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 15. September 2006 — CK - Washington. A Cologne court called the publication of an EMail a violation of personality or privacy rights of the sender. …
CK - Washington. Small court, big issue: When does a notice sent by email arrive? When it's sent? At the time the addressee's email client pulls it from the server? When the recipient notices it? Within a certain number of hours or days after mailing? What if the addressee is occupied with other matters? Visits the restroom? Lies in the hospital? Or enjoys a vacation? A German court decided the issue for the following set of facts: After business hours, a customer ordered travel arrangements from a travel agency, then booked the arrangements online and sent an email to the agency to cancel the initial order. The next morning, the travel agent arrived at the office before its usual business hours, noticed the order, fulfilled it, and noticed the email only after her return from a conference. The customer ended up with two travel arrangements and sued the agent for the resulting cancellation fee. Click here for the decision, in German. The Meldorf court of first instance held on March 29, 2011 in the matter 81 C 1601/10: 1) The notice was not received before the next business day. 2) The agent is free to schedule her day, as a matter of constitutional law. Nothing requires her, therefore, to give priority to reading emails first thing in the morning. 3) The exact time of when the emailed not…
» Vollständiger ArtikelGerman American Law Journal :: American Edition | 15. September 2006 — CK - Washington. A Cologne court called the publication of an EMail a violation of personality or privacy rights of the sender. …
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 31. Juli 2005 — CK - Washington. An employee created a software program for his employer. He performed the service, in part, at his home office …
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 26. Oktober 2005 — CK - Washington. German courts are pushing internet operators ever harder. A June 6, 2005 decision by the Winsen a.d. Luhe court…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 30. August 2006 — TS - Washington. On July 7, 2006, the Bundesgerichtshof, BGH, the German supreme court for civil matters, decided in the matter …
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 1. Mai 2005 — CK - Washington. Sometimes, business has international issues outside of the transactional practice. For example, questions aris…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 4. März 2006 — CJ - Washington. On March 2, 2006, the Constitutional Supreme Court in Karlsruhe announced its decision on a constitutional comp…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 18. Januar 2005 — ACP - Washington. The Karlsruhe Court of Appeals, Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe, decided a controversy between a university in Bad…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 24. Mai 2008 — CK - Washington. A 2007 decision recently added to the MIR index reminds the author of crazy German laws and an unimaginative de…
Transblawg | 22. Mai 2011 — I had heard some positive opinions on LinkedIn, but I don't want to join yet. It seems, however, that unless you're a member you …
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 15. Oktober 2010 — CK - Washington. Rights of use in the copyright held by a programmer, not trademark rights are the objects of a GPL open source …
Washington, DC, USA, American-German law firm, German-American attorney; deutsch-amerikanischer Rechtsanwalt in Amerika, amerikanische Anwaelte