More than 27,000 S. Korean users join class-action suit against Apple

CHANGWON, South Korea, Aug. 1 (Yonhap) — “More than 27,000 iPhone users in South Korea have paid to join a class-action suit against the Korean unit of the U.S. electronics giant Apple Inc., claiming that Apple breached their privacy by tracking and storing their location, a law firm engaged in the case said Monday.

The people responded to Miraelaw’s appeal for participation in the class-action suit from July 15 till July 31 after its lawyer Kim Hyung-suk, an iPhone user, received 1 million won (US$950) in the first court-ordered compensation from Apple Korea over its privacy violations, according to the law firm.

The class-action suit will likely seek a combined compensation of 27 billion won, or 1 million won to each of the complaints, the firm said.

The Changwon-based firm also said it will lodge the suit against Apple Korea in early or mid August either with the Changwon District Court or the Seoul Central District Court.

The firm will also consider diverting the suit to Apple’s U.S. headquarters, given that it is the manufacturer of the location-tracking mobile phone.

“Apple Korea has the possibility of avoiding its responsibility as it is a mere sales unit of Apple headquarters,” Lee Jae-cheol, a Miraelaw attorney, said. “We are in discussions on whether the lawsuit should cover Apple’s U.S. head office.”

The number of iPhone users who joined the planned class-action suit represents less than 1 percent of the total 3 million iPhone units sold locally.

The fewer-than-expected number of users was mainly the result of the low probability t…

» Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches

Themen: Iphone , Apple , Freedom , Lawyer , South Korea , Class Action , Global Forum Shopping , Tracking Location

Erschienen 3. August 2011 auf http://www.usa-recht.de.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Privatsphäre: Vorteil entdrosseltes iPhone

German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch | 1. September 2009 — CK - Washington.   PrivaCy für entdrosselte iPhones schützt die Privatsphäre. Vielleicht entlastet es auch Softwarehersteller beim…

Most Ridiculous Lawsuits USA: Ex-client targets Louisville firm Becker Law

USA Recht | 8. März 2012 — With its ad campaigns advising the injured and maimed that they “better call Becker,” Louisville’s Becker Law Office says i…

iPod mini - Streit um koreanische Kopie

MarkenBlog | 5. Dezember 2005 — Mac Essentials berichtet via Korea Times über den Konflikt zwischen Apple Korea und Iops. Der fünftgrößte koreanische MP3…

IPhone Apps verletzten Markenrechte

Recht geblogt | 25. Mai 2009Apple entfernt zwei Anwendungen (Apps) aus seinem App Store, die angeblich gegen eine Marke von Cartier International verstoßen…

Lawyers to pay $25 million in Princess Di dispute

USA Recht | 25. Januar 2011 — In den USA gibt es grundsätzlich keine Kostenerstattung bei gewonnenen Prozessen; ausnahmsweise nur dann, wenn es gelingt nachz…

How Apple could fight Cisco

MarkenBlog | 14. Januar 2007 — How Apple could fight Cisco news analysis A cell phone is to an Internet phone as an airplane is to a faucet? That an…

NY Firm Gets $56 Million Fee, Firm’s Largest Ever, in Backdating Suit

USA Recht | 29. Juni 2010 — New York Lawyer | June 25, 2010; By Nate Raymond ; A federal judge in Brooklyn has approved a $56 million fee for Pomeran…

iPhone: Das passende Handy zur Robe

arbeitsrechtblog | 11. Februar 2007 — Im Roben-Blog bin ich auf einen interessanten Gedanken gestossen: Das im stylischen Farbton schwarz gehaltene neue iPhone von …

iPhone: Das passende Handy zur Robe

arbeitsrechtblog | 11. Februar 2007 — Im Roben-Blog bin ich auf einen interessanten Gedanken gestossen: Das im stylischen Farbton schwarz gehaltene neue iPhone von …

Phone Customer Data

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 8. September 2004 — CS - Bonn   On August 18, 2004, the Thuringia Court of Appeals in case number 2 U 1038/03 upheld a lower court decision to confirm…