Law Drops EMail

CJ - Washington.   On March 2, 2006, the Constitutional Supreme Court in Karlsruhe announced its decision on a constitutional complaint of a judge from Heidelberg concerning the secrecy of telecommunication, a constitutional right embodied in Art. 10(1) of the German constitution, Grundgesetz, in the matter 2 BvR 2099/04. The justices held that the secrecy of telecommunication extends only to the transmission of a communication. Such protection expires with the termination of the transmission. The court decided that electronic data such as stored EMails which result from a completed transmission of data and are saved on the addressee's system are not protected by the secrecy principle governing telecommunications. For such data, the right of self-determination, Art. 2(1), Art. 1 (1) of the constitution, Grundgesetz, controls. In addition, the rule of secrecy does not protect any data--beyond EMail--archived by the recipient on a hard drive as a result of a transmission, for instance a data file downloaded from the internet. The court published a decision and a press release. German American Law Journal :: Washington USA

  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Email , Grundgesetz , Bvr , Supreme Court , Karlsruhe , Heidelberg

Erschienen 4. März 2006 auf http://galj.info.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Access to Data at ISP

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 16. Januar 2007 — CK - Washington.   Piercing the layers of personal data protection in Germany, and much of the European Union, depends on the stat…

Unconstitutional Data Hoarding

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 2. März 2010 — CK - Washington.   The unfettered collection of internet connection data by communications service providers for its potential use…

Secrets Under Constitution

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 19. April 2006 — CK - Washington.   Constitutional protection extends to trade secrets in matters before the administrative law courts, the Constit…

Judge May Defend Pro Hac Vice and Pro Bono

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 9. März 2006 — CJ - Washington.   On March 9, 2006, the Constitutional Supreme Court in Karlsruhe announced its decision on a constitutional comp…

Jail for Incest Deferred

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 3. März 2007 — CK - Washington.   The federal constitutional court in Karlsruhe is to rule on the issue of the criminal prohibition of incest and…

Seizing Client Data From Lawyers

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 11. Juni 2005 — CK - Washington.   In the course of a criminal investigation, the police may not search and seize all the data-storing equipment o…

TV Report Lacks Defendant's ID

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 28. November 2008 — CK - Washington.   May German media publish the names of criminal defendants in their court reports? That is the central issue in …

U.S. Complaint to be Served

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 9. Februar 2007 — CK - Washington.   On January 24, 2007, the federal supreme court for constitutional matters, Bundesverfassungsgericht, in Karlsru…

Inviolability of Law Offices

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 21. Mai 2008 — CK - Washington.   Searches of, and seizures in, law offices require enhanced constitutional scrutiny, the German Constitutional S…

No Internet Fears at Supreme Court

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 27. Januar 2010 — CK - Washington.   German top courts are less fearful of the Internet than German politicians, voters and lower courts. Fearless, …

German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch
BMJ | Pressemitteilungen

Hier finden Sie die Pressemitteilungen des Bundesministeriums der Justiz" />


Recht auf informationelle Selbstbestimmung schützt im Herrschaftsbereich des Teilnehmers gespeicherte Telekommunikationsverbindungsdaten
Das Bundesverfassungsgericht