International Patent Applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

Note This article is an excerpt of a brochure I prepared for my firm summarizing the pros and cons of international patent applications pursuant to the PCT.

Read the whole article at the BARDEHLE website.

Introduction

The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) enables applicants to initiate patent protection for an invention in almost any country of the world (as of January 2010, there are 142 PCT contracting states) by means of a single international patent application – the PCT application. Following a centralized search of the international patent application, the applicant obtains a detailed preliminary assessment of the patentability of the invention – the international preliminary report on patentability.

The international application, however, does not lead to an “international patent”. On the contrary, 30 or 31 months after the priority date of the international application, applicant has to select national/ regional patent offices of the countries or regions, where patent protection is finally desired. Each selected national/ regional patent office then independently decides on the patentability of the international patent application in the respective country/region.

Filing a single international patent application not only results in less administrative efforts in the early stages of the application but also has an import…

Bitte beachten Sie: Dieser Artikel ist nicht mehr im Original verfügbar.

  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Patentability , Publications , International Patent Application

Erschienen 1. Oktober 2010 auf http://kandidatenwiki.de/.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

International Patent Applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT)

KandidatenWiki | 1. Oktober 2010 — Note This article is an excerpt of a brochure I prepared for my firm summarizing the pros and cons of international patent app…

EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal Says EP Application is Pending Until Expiry of Appeal Period (G 1/09)

Visae Patentes | 4. Oktober 2010 — Rule 25(1) EPC 1973 (and equally Rule 36(1) EPC) states "The applicant may file a divisional application relating to any pending e…

EPO tightens Information Disclosure Requirements

Visae Patentes | 4. August 2010 — Since the entering into force of the revised European Patent Convention (EPC 2000) on 13 December 2007, the EPO may "invite the a…

Uspto Fee Schedule: USPTO: Gebührenübersicht

MarkenBlog | 5. Juli 2007 — Das US Patent & Trademark Office USPTO hat seine Gebührenübersicht aktualisiert. Für eine Markenanmeldung fallen z.B. f…

Reminder: Changes of EPC Entering Into Force as from 1 January 2011 (Information on Prior Art)

Visae Patentes | 26. Dezember 2010 — As already mentioned earlier on this blog, the following important changes of the EPC Implementing Regulations will enter into fo…

European Patent Network Supports Filing of Search Results under Amended Rule 141 EPC

Visae Patentes | 24. Oktober 2010Illustration on the website of the Europen Patent Network According to a Notice dated 28 July 2010 of the Administrative…

TM (R) (C) Pat. Pend.

Law & Justice | 10. Oktober 2005 — What do those symbols mean? TM TM stands for trademark. A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of t…

Multi-urn patent/Familienbegräbnis

Transblawg | 18. November 2005 — In Berlin Blawg, Dennis Sevriens shows part of a patent application for an urn with four compartments (including the diagram)…

T 1423/07 - Double Patenting is Possible According to the EPC

Visae Patentes | 10. Mai 2010 — The recent decision T 1423/07 of the EPO Board of Appeal disagreed with the opinion of the Examining Division, according to which…

G 1/06 - Zur Problematik der Teilanmeldungen

ipweblog.de | 17. Juli 2007 — Die große Beschwerdekammer hat sich in G 1/06 nun zur Problematik der Teilanmeldungen geäußert. Leitsatz: “In the case of…

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG: International Patent Applications PCT