Google Cache is legal, Nevada court rules

A district court in Nevada brought down the ruling yesterday, deciding that Google was not breaking the law because it honors the “robots.txt” and “nocache” headers, because it automatically caches without human intervention, because cacheing is a fair use, and because this activity falls into a copyright exemption called a “safe harbor.”

Blake Field, an author and attorney, brought the copyright infringement lawsuit against Google after the search engine automatically copied and cached a story he posted on his website. The district court found that Mr. Field “attempted to manufacture a claim for copyright infringement against Google in hopes of making money from Google’s standard [cacheing] practice.” Google responded that its Google Cache feature, which allows Google users to link to an archival copy of websites indexed by Google, does not violate copyright law.

(eff.org via boingboing.net)

Bitte beachten Sie: Dieser Artikel ist nicht mehr im Original verfügbar.

  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Google , Safe Harbor

Erschienen 26. Januar 2006 auf http://www.aktenvermerk.at.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Google-Cache verstößt nicht gegen Copyright-Gesetze

Rechtblog | 26. Januar 2006 — Der US-Amerikaner Blake A. Field ist vor dem District Court von Nevada mit seinem Versuch gescheitert, den Suchmaschinenbetreiber …

Google.nederland: Nederland Onderzoekt Google´s Privacybeleid

Law & Justice | 31. März 2006 — Het College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens (CBP) zal de diensten van Google onder de loep leggen om antwoord te krijgen op de vraag …

Belgische Zeitungen verklagen Google

Handakte WebLAWg | 29. Mai 2008 — Belgian newspapers are pushing for up to €49m (£39m) in damages from Google for publishing and storing their content without pa…

The Google Robot FAQ

Jurabilis | 19. Januar 2006 — Frequently Asked Questions (Last update: November 1st, 2030) What are Google Robots? Google Robots are our human-like machines tha…

Google Ist Nicht Dein Freund: Google ist nicht dein Freund

neues aus schwabenheim | 12. Juli 2005 — Der große bunte Suchmaschinenmonopolist ist der Ausgangspunkt für jede Recherche im Netz. Menschen, Meinungen, Bilder und Büche…

Viacom vs. Google – Runde #1

Dr. Behrmann & Härtel | 24. Juni 2010 — In dem Rechtsstreit zwischen den US-Unternehmen Viacom und Google (Streitwert US$ 1 Mrd.) hat der Internetriese einen Etappensieg …

Google Doesn’t Wait for EU Governments

Law & Justice | 19. Oktober 2005 — Google has launched its books scan engine "Google Print" in eight European countries (local-language sites): Germany, France, Ital…

German Court Views Street View

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 2. April 2011 — NK - Washington.   The German Court of Appeals for the District of Berlin, Kammergericht, released a press statement in the matter…

Google erklärt googlen

MarkenBlog | 31. Oktober 2006 — Usage: ‘Google’ as noun referring to, well, us. Example: “I just love Google, they’re soooo cute and cuddly and adorable …

Google - Our lawyers say...

Weblawg.de | 1. November 2006 — "... Usage: 'Google' as noun referring to, well, us. Example: "I just love Google, they're soooo cute and cuddly and adorable …

Boing Boing: Google Cache is legal

A weblog about pop culture"/>


EFF: DeepLinks

Electronic Frontier Foundation is a nonprofit group working to protect your digital rights." />