FCPA: Smith & Nephew DPA: Lessons Learned in Using Distributors

A distributor can be generally defined as a company or individual who purchases a product from an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and then independently sells that product to an end user. A distributor takes title, physical possession and owns the products. The distributor then sells the product again to an end-using purchaser. The distributor usually receives the product at some discount from the OEM and then is free to set the resell price at any amount above what was originally paid for the product. A distributor is often used by the US manufacturing industry to act as a sales force outside of the US.

The landscape of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is littered with cases involving both agents and resellers, who are most clearly acting as representatives of the companies whose goods or services they sell for in foreign countries. However, many US businesses believe that the legal differences between agents/resellers and distributors insulate them from FCPA liability should the conduct of the distributor violate the Act. They believe that as the distributor takes title and physical possession of the product, the legal risk of ownership has shifted to the distributor. If the goods are damaged or destroyed, the loss will be the distributor’s not the US business which manufactured the product. Under this same analysis, many US companies believe that the FCPA risk has also shifted from the US company to the foreign distributor. However, such belief is sorely miss-placed.

As reported by the FCPA Professor and FCPA Blog, on February 1, 2012, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it entered into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) with Smith & Nephew, Inc., a medical equipment manufacturer, for violations of the FCPA. Smith & Nephew paid a monetary penalty of $16.8MM to the DOJ and $5.4MM to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as a civil penalty, all for a total of $22.2MM in fines and penalties. The violations revolved around a Greek distributor of Smith & Nephew who paid bribes to Greek doctors so that they would purchase and use Smith & Nephew products. According to the FCPA Professor, in a post entitled “Next Up – Smith & Nephew”, Smith and Nephew and its German subsidiary, would sell products to the entities “at a discount to the ‘list’ price and the Greek Distributor would re-sell to Greek HCPs and government hospitals at a profit.”

Further, as noted by the Professor, the purpose in setting up these entities “was to secure lucrative business with hospitals in the Greek public health care system by making and promising to make corrupt payments of money and things of value to publicly-employed Greek HCPs.” According to the information, “S&N, certain of its executives, employees, and affiliates agreed to sell to [the] Greek Distributor at full list price, then pay th…

» Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Department OF Justice , Securities And Exchange Commission , Fcpa , Foreign Corrupt Practices Act , Doj , Deferred Prosecution Agreement , Monetary Penalty , Original Equipment Manufacturer , Nietzer&häusler , Bribery And Corruption , Amerikanisches Unternehmensrecht , Civil Penalty , Distributor , Entity Designation , Healthcare System , Monitorship , US Business

Erschienen 28. Februar 2012 auf http://www.usa-recht.de.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

FCPA: Distributors under the FCPA

USA Recht | 28. Februar 2013 — If there was ever a question that distributors were covered under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), in 2012, the Depa…

FCPA: Distributors Should Be Analyzed As Any Other Third Party Representative in the Sales Chain

USA Recht | 21. März 2013 — Ed. Note-David Simon is a partner at Foley and Lardner and Bill Athanas is a partner at Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis, LL…

FCPA: Top Ten Enforcement Actions for 2012

USA Recht | 17. Januar 2013 — As we welcome in 2013, it is appropriate to reflect back on some of the things which have occurred over 2012 and in the Forei…

FCPA: The BizJet DPA: Cooperation is the Key

USA Recht | 27. März 2012 — Last week, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the resolution of an enforcement action under the Foreign Corrupt Practi…

CAVEAT: Beendigung von US-Vertragshändlerverträgen

USA Recht | 16. Juli 2010 — Nachfolgend finden Sie ein Musterklausel, die Sie in der einen oder anderen Form (und nach finalem Check mit dem anwendbaren Re…

FCPA: RAE and Settlement of FCPA Violations in China

USA Recht | 24. April 2012 — As reported on Friday, December 10, 2010 in the FCPA Blog and by others, RAE Systems, Inc., (RAE) a California-based gas detecti…

Legal translation problems in China/Übersetzungsprobleme bei Verträgen in China

Transblawg | 13. April 2012 — On China Law Blog, in a post titled The Legal Faults With Faulty China Translations, Dan Harris suggests you need a good legal tra…

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act – SEC v. Veraz

USA Recht | 3. Juli 2010 — Ein Fall, aus dem unter anderem gelernt werden kann, dass Blumen eben nicht immer gleich Blumen sind, sondern ein (teurer) Ver…

The FCPA Guidance and Declinations

USA Recht | 17. Dezember 2012 — I have previously written about my belief that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) should go further in releasing information …

What Steps Can Lead to a Reduction in a FCPA Fine?

USA Recht | 2. September 2010 — Interessanter Artikel zum Frage, welche Massnahmen und welche Art der Zusammenarbeit seitens der Unternehmen von den US-Behörde…

The FCPA Blog - The FCPA Blog

News And Views About The United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)


Next Up – Smith & Nephew « FCPA Professor