Rule 25(1) EPC 1973 (and equally Rule 36(1) EPC) states "The applicant may file a divisional application relating to any pending earlier European patent application". In the EP patent application 01102231.6 the question arose whether or not for an application that has been r…
» Vollständiger ArtikelErschienen 4. Oktober 2010 auf http://www.visaepatentes.com.
Visae Patentes | 4. Oktober 2010 — Rule 25(1) EPC 1973 (and equally Rule 36(1) EPC) states "The applicant may file a divisional application relating to any pending …
ipweblog.de | 17. Juli 2007 — Die große Beschwerdekammer hat sich in G 1/06 nun zur Problematik der Teilanmeldungen geäußert. Leitsatz: “In the case of…
Visae Patentes | 4. August 2010 — Since the entering into force of the revised European Patent Convention (EPC 2000) on 13 December 2007, the EPO may "invite the a…
Visae Patentes | 10. Mai 2010 — The recent decision T 1423/07 of the EPO Board of Appeal disagreed with the opinion of the Examining Division, according to which…
Visae Patentes | 26. Dezember 2010 — As already mentioned earlier on this blog, the following important changes of the EPC Implementing Regulations will enter into fo…
KandidatenWiki | 1. Oktober 2010 — Note This article is an excerpt of a brochure I prepared for my firm summarizing the pros and cons of international patent app…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 28. Mai 2007 — CK - Washington. Based on a pending trademark application, the applicant complained with a cease and desist demand of the improp…
Jurabilis | 23. Oktober 2008 — ... lehrt uns dieser filmreife Fall: In December, 2004, Louis J. Desy, Jr., submitted an application for admission to the Massac…
ipweblog.de | 28. November 2008 — Große Beschwerdekammer des EPA vom 25. November 2008 - G 2/06: (Pressemitteilung des EPA) Die Große Beschwerdekammer des Eu…
Visae Patentes | 26. April 2010 — In one EP application my firm is in charge of, the European Search Report, which was issued on 19 Aug 2005, only cited A-classifi…
