EMail Published, Protected Like Letter

CK - Washington.   A Cologne court called the publication of an EMail a violation of personality or privacy rights of the sender. The matter 28 O 178/06, decided on September 9, 2006, involves an EMail from a corporation that the recipient apparently forwarded to a party which published it on the Internet. The EMail is mentioned as an exhibit and not attached to the decision. Therefore, the exact route of the EMail to the publisher is unclear. A discussion at the Berlin Blawg turns on whether the decision is a tragic mistake because the court addresses the privacy issue but fails to address the option of a sender to encrypt EMail. The discussion centers on the ability to publish unencrypted EMail because it is not protected like a postal letter. Rather, unencrypted EMail is like a postcard. The discussion does not yet address the expectation of privacy on the part of the sender. German American Law Journal :: Washington USA

  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Email , Berlin , Blawg

Erschienen 15. September 2006 auf http://galj.info.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Protected Expression in Closed Online Forum

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 19. August 2010 — CK - Washington.   Without fear of disclosure to third parties, users of closed online mailing lists may express and form their op…

Liability of Address User

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 26. Dezember 2009 — CK - Washington.   Bad news for commercial users of German email addresses: The renters of email address lists can be liable under…

Internet Contact Data Explained

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 24. Mai 2008 — CK - Washington.   A 2007 decision recently added to the MIR index reminds the author of crazy German laws and an unimaginative de…

Sanctity of EMail

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 18. Januar 2005 — ACP - Washington.   The Karlsruhe Court of Appeals, Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe, decided a controversy between a university in Bad…

Third Party EMail with Ad

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 27. November 2005 — CK - Washington.   Who, if anybody, should be civilly liable for an EMail that contains a product recommendation from a business w…

Notice by Email: Deemed Receipt

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 28. April 2011 — CK - Washington.   Small court, big issue: When does a notice sent by email arrive? When it's sent? At the time the addressee's em…

Law Drops EMail

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 4. März 2006 — CJ - Washington.   On March 2, 2006, the Constitutional Supreme Court in Karlsruhe announced its decision on a constitutional comp…

Annahme verweigert

kanzlei-hoenig.de | 6. Juni 2009 — Der Mandant hat mich per eMail um eine Stellungnahme und um meine Unterstützung gebeten. Ich habe ihm per eMail geantwortet. Ei…

UK High Court Considers e-Signature

Law & Justice | 15. Mai 2006 — The High Court (Manchester, UK) has considered whether an offer to give a personal guarantee by email was enforceable under the …

Discretion in Privacy Law

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 14. September 2008 — CK - Washington.   The Dr. Bahr Collection publishes a Hamburg ruling of June 6, 2008 in the matter 324 0 1069/07 on the obligatio…

German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch
E-Mails, Email, Geheimnisschutz, Geheimnis, Presserecht, Ver�ffentlichung, Rechtsanwalt, K�ln, Wettbewerbsrecht, eBay, Abmahnung, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht

Rechtsanw�lte Lampmann Behn & Rosenbaum in K�ln. Wir beraten Sie in Sachen eBay, Onlinerecht, Urheberrecht, Markenrecht, Verkehrsrecht, Strafrecht und Englische Limited Rechtsanwalt


BERLIN BLAWG - SEWOMA® » Blog Archive » LG Köln: eMail ist ein verschlossener Brief

» LG Köln: eMail ist ein verschlossener Brief" />


Berliner, Corcoran&Rowe