Double Trouble Hits Spammer
am 21.12.2006 von German American Law Journal :: American Edition
KR - Washington. Spam EMails violate various German statutes. Most commonly, a cause of action is based on the Unfair Competition Statute, UWG, of July 3, 2004, BGBl. I, p.1414, as amended on April 19, 2006, BGBl. I, p.866.
On October 25, 2006, the Karlsruhe Court of Appeals decided in the matter of 6 U 35/06 that the unauthorized usage and transmission of spam mails with true or fake addresses containing the name of a service provider not affiliated with the sender after the @ sign also violate the German Trademark Statute (MarkenG) of October 25, 1994, BGBl. I, p. 3082, as last amended on October 31, 2006, BGBl. I, p. 2407.
The defendant, a commercial provider of pornographic websites, promoted his services through @hotmail.com EMails. Plaintiff Microsoft owns internet service Hotmail, which owns a registered European Community trademark pursuant to Article 9 (1)(a) of the Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of December 20, 1993 on the Community Trade Mark.
The plaintiff had already prevailed in a prior legal dispute between the parties in this matter based on the UWG. However, the appellate court held that the prior decision does not bar, as res judicata, plaintiff from suing defendant again because the facts and circumstances of the new case based on trademark violations are different. Although the court previously granted injunctive relief concerning the transmission of spam without prior consent of the addressees, it had not considered the trademark issue.
The court held that the unauthorized use of the name Hotmail …
Plants Due Diligence
German American Law Journal :: American Edition / CB - Washington. On February 14, 2006, the Supreme Court in Karlsruhe, Bundesgerichtshof, decided a conflict relating to the plant protection statute, Sortenschutzgesetz, of December 11, 1985, BGBl. I, p.2170, as amended on January 21, 200…
Internet Auction and Trademark
German American Law Journal :: American Edition / CK - Washington. After a recent change in the law on online provider liability, the German Supreme Court confirmed its prior view on the liability shield for internet service providers in cases of trademark violations committed by their custo…
Perfume Trademarks
German American Law Journal :: American Edition / HG - Washington. According to Section 19 of the German Trademark Statute, Markengesetz, a trademark owner may demand information from any infringer of the trademark about the origin and distributor of the infringing goods. The Supreme Cour…
Forum Owner Liable for Visitor Action
German American Law Journal :: American Edition / CK - Washington. German courts are pushing internet operators ever harder. A June 6, 2005 decision by the Winsen a.d. Luhe court holds the operator of an internet forum responsible for comments by a visitor. The visitor added a fake mug shot t…
Hotel Marks in Germany and Spain
German American Law Journal :: American Edition / CK - Washington. In the matter 33 O 209/03, the Cologne District Court, Landgericht ruled on September 13, 2005 that a German trademark for hotels in Germany is not violated by the same mark used for a hotel in Spain even if the Spanish hotel…
Beware the German Domain Rule
German American Law Journal :: American Edition / CK - Washington. In the dim ages of the Internet, trademark law and domain law were two separate branches of the law. Trademark law addressed priorities and the domestic, territorial nexus of vendor and goods or services. Domain law resolved…
» German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch
» MarkenG - nichtamtliches Inhaltsverzeichnis
» UWG - nichtamtliches Inhaltsverzeichnis
© 2004-2008 JuraBlogs | Impressum
