Starbucks ./. Starbock geht in die nächste Runde
MarkenBlog | 17. Oktober 2005 — Markenbusiness hatte über die Entscheidung in Sachen Kaffeekonzern Starbucks gegen Biermarke Starbock berichtet: Der seit…
The Washington Post; Lawyer Jimmy A. Bell goes after Landover nail salon for charging men more than women. Jimmy A. Bell was taking a lady friend to dinner last fall when they decided to stop off first at a Landover salon for a little pampering: a his-and-her manicure/pedicure. Everything was fine, he said, until it was time to leave. “I went to pay the bill while she was letting her nails dry — and they had charged me $2 more than they charged her,” recalls the outraged customer. “I said, ‘Wait a minute, why a I paying more?’ They said, ‘Because you’re a man.’ That salon may have messed with the wrong well-groomed guy. Bell is a Bowie-based lawyer with a knack for the headline-making case — he’s represented comedian D.L. Hughley and “Top Chef” contestant Timothy Dean in suits against local businesses, as well as himself in a complaint against Domino’s over its refusal to deliver to certain neighborhoods (the Justice Department ultimately got the pizzamakers to agree to a nondiscriminatory policy). This week, Bell filed suit in Prince George’s County Circuit Court against the manicure place, Rich’s Nail Salon, alleging gender-based price discrimination.
For those extra four bucks — a $2 surcharge each on manly hands and feet — Bell is seeking $200,000 from the salon.
“They’re making money off of men illegally,” Bell told us. “I don’t get painted, just the regular buff. They didn’t measure my hands or my nails to see if it’s more work. They made a distinction based on the fact that I’m a man. … You’d be outraged if they said blacks pay more or Jews pay more.”
Bell said he took the case to court after a complaint he filed with the county Human Relations Commission appeared to stall. The owner of the nail salon did not return our call seeking …
» Vollständiger ArtikelErschienen 16. Oktober 2010 auf http://www.usa-recht.de.
MarkenBlog | 17. Oktober 2005 — Markenbusiness hatte über die Entscheidung in Sachen Kaffeekonzern Starbucks gegen Biermarke Starbock berichtet: Der seit…
MarkenBlog | 4. September 2006 — Am 6. November soll vor dem 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans die Berufung im Markenstreit zwischen Starbucks und Sta…
Handakte WebLAWg | 20. Februar 2009 — Bis zuletzt hat sich ein Häftling in den USA gegen seine Hinrichtung gewehrt, ehe die Justizbehörden im US-Staat Virginia das T…
German American Law Journal :: US-Recht auf Deutsch | 17. November 2008 — CK - Washington. Die vierte Entscheidung der Amtsperiode erging heute im Obersten Bundesgerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten in W…
e-comm | 25. Februar 2009 — Der US Supreme Court hat heute in der Sache Bell v. Linkline entschieden (Urteil); zur Vorgeschichte und zum wesentlichen Sachverh…
USA Recht | 25. Februar 2012 — A St. Clair County man claims he lost a tooth after he bit into a peanut butter sandwich containing a hard substance the…
USA Recht | 22. Oktober 2010 — The West Virginia Record; Attorney sues Nike after breaking her ankle. A Charleston attorney and her husband are suing Nike USA…
USA Recht | 12. Juni 2010 — Ungerechtfertigte 911 Notrufe ziehen in den USA Strafen nach sich. Legally Weird / Findlaw.com: In most cases, someone taking…
e-comm | 22. Mai 2007 — In der heutigen Verhandlung des US Supreme Court konnte Justice Scalia wieder einmal auf seine Vergangenheit im Telekombereich hin…
it-recht-plus.de | 25. April 2011 — Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Lutz Schroeder mahnt Urheberrechtsverletzungen in Online-Tauschbörsen (durch sog. “Filesharing”) für …