Happy End in Freude
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 24. April 2006 — CK - Washington. As reported on April 24, 2006 by Netzpolitik.org, the Freude appeal confirmed the dismissal of the criminal cha…
CK - Washington. Alvar Freude founded ODEM.org, a German website that promotes online demonstrations. Freude will be tried in a Stuttgart court on October 7, 2004. The offense: ODEM.org discussed censorship. The article contains a link to a right wing web site. The web site had been outlawed by a Düsseldorf court under laws prohibiting certain activities such as the glorification of Nazis. Apparently, the latter court launched a criminal investigation into offering that link. The LAWgical alerts readers to the trial and notes that the suppression of links runs counter to the web principles enunciated by Technical Advisory Group des W3C, in particular its September 11, 2004 findings on deep links. Freude's team comments that courts and the justice system got lost in the net. Their comment includes a recital of the charges which equate links with providing illegally access to censored material. ODEM argues that the censorship law does not apply to web links when the topic is a current event issue of public interest, such as the censorship laws themselves which by necessity address censoring. ODEM charges also that the authorities disregarded the blatant satire on censorship on a second site that also forms a basis for the charges against Freude.
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 24. April 2006 — CK - Washington. As reported on April 24, 2006 by Netzpolitik.org, the Freude appeal confirmed the dismissal of the criminal cha…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 19. April 2009 — CK - Washington. A devisive issue splits German public opinion before the upcoming elections: To censor or not? The third step o…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 20. April 2009 — CK - Washington. A divisive issue splits German public opinion before the upcoming elections: To censor or not? The third step o…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 17. Oktober 2004 — CK - Washington. German news group Deutsche Welle broadcasts world-wide and currently sponsors a blog contest called BOBs where …
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 16. März 2005 — CK - Washington. Today, in JungleWorld, the immateriblog.de writer Mathias Spielkamp reports on censorship in German law with re…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 4. August 2008 — CK - Washington. The pendulum swings again: At least non-commercial German bloggers are not responsible for third-party comments…
Aktenvermerk | 19. April 2006 — Das Strafverfahren gegen Alvar Freude wegen Links ist nun beim OLG Stuttgart gelandet, nachdem die Staatsanwaltschaft Revisio…
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 10. September 2008 — CK - Washington. Censorship in Germany is no more prevalent than censorship is in the United States. Unlike strange FCC rulings,…
LawBlog | 17. Juli 2009 — ” How would censorship work in the Internet age? Australia gives us a sneak preview of the gong show that ensues when medieval …
German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 14. März 2005 — ACP - Washington. The Appellate Court of Hamburg, Oberlandesgericht Hamburg, decided recently that internet sellers need to clea…