Cabinet seeks to tighten Employee Data Privacy Protection

On August 25, the Cabinet passed a comprehensive bill amending the German Federal Data Privacy Protection Act. The bill now goes to the German Parliament. A brief overview follows, discussing the most important changes that in all probability will soon become mandatory federal law.

Video Surveillance

Surveillance of business premises primarily used by employees for matters that have to do with their own lives (sanitary facilities, changing rooms and bedders) will be categorically prohibited. Covert video surveillance will only be permitted if there are actual clues and grounds for suspicion of crimes or serious breaches of contract. Hence, routine deployment of covert video surveillance will be prohibited. Open video surveillance – for example at company entrances or for quality control purposes – will be allowed “in as far as it is necessary for safeguarding important business interests“, if it is not contrary to employees’ interests and if employees are made aware of the camera.

GPS Surveillance

Employers are permitted to track the location of an employee during working hours and time spent on standby duty only, that is, not during time off or leave. If employees are permitted to use their company car, for example, for private purposes, GPS tracking of their location will not be permitted during the private use. Even the collection, use and processing of data during working hours and time spent on standby duty will not be permissible unless this is necessary for operational reasons, e.g., when the employee is transporting valuable papers and the employer therefore has a considerable interest in continuously tracking the location of its property. Secretly tracking the location of employees is not permissible. In order to provide the required transparency for employees, employers have to make the deployment of a positioning system recognizable and must inform employees of the manner in which the positioning data is used.

Use of Telephone, E-mail, and Internet

The monitoring of an e-mail inbox will only be possible if private use is prohibited, if this is known to employees, and if monitoring is indispensable for carrying out business operations in due manner. Other than this change, the new law does not include a special regulation regarding private use of telecommunication means, so aside from the change regarding e-mail, the current legal requirements continue to apply:

If employees are permitted to use the employer’s telecommunications systems for business use only, employers are entitled to monitor communication to the degree required, for example, for monitoring of performance and conduct. However, the legitimate protectable interests of employees must always be observed. Surveillance of private communication is permitted i… » Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches

Themen: Datenschutz , Compliance , Parliament , Surveillance , Transparency , (en) , Data Protection IN Germany , Employees
Rechtsgebiet: Arbeitsrecht

Erschienen 15. Oktober 2010 auf http://www.cmshs-bloggt.de.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Terminating Employees

USA Recht | 17. Juni 2010 — In most states, “at-will” employees (that is, employees who do not have employment contracts for a particular term or who are n…

Workers’ Compensation

USA Recht | 17. Juni 2010 — Workers’ Compensation for Injured Employees In every state, employers must provide workers’ compensation benefits to employee…

A sample company policy on e-mail and Internet usage

USA Recht | 17. Juni 2010 — Company computers, computer files, the e-mail system, Internet access and the software furnished to employees are company property…

Kündigungsschutzgesetz Englisch: Englische Vertragsmuster #5: Deutscher Kündigungsschutz für anglo-amerikanische Mandanten

Rechthaber | 24. November 2008 — Haben Sie schon einmal versucht, einem US-Amerikaner oder einem Briten das deutsche Kündigungsschutzgesetz zu erklären? Das ist…

Performance Evaluation

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 10. Januar 2005 — CK - Washington.   Cheat and lie - that has long been the expectation of employers and employees in Germany under the rules for pe…

Germany+data Protection+3+July+2009: Burden and Relief: German Data Protection

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 5. Juli 2009 — CK - Washington.   On July 3, 2009, the federal diet in Berlin passed executive-sponsored data protection and data audit amendment…

Diebstahl von Geschäftsgeheimnissen und Trade Secret/Non-Compete Audits

USA Recht | 3. Juni 2010 — Der nachfolgende Artikel von Cary Levitt, Jeffrey Schultz, Michael Kass, John Vering and Larry Tucker (Armstrong Teasdale LL…

US-Arbeitsrecht – Informationen und praktische Hinweise

USA Recht | 29. Mai 2010 — Foreign companies opening a manufacturing facility in the U.S. are faced with broad U.S. labor laws which by no means do have a…

Lost Between the Lines

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 14. August 2008 — MJW - Washington.   A peculiar aspect of German labor law is the letter of recommendation known as Arbeitszeugnis. It reflects par…

U.S.Employment – some practical hints

USA Recht | 18. Mai 2010 — Auszug aus einer englischsprachigen Veröffentlichung zu US-Arbeitsrecht aus einer Fachzeitschrift, daher an dieser Stelle ebenso …