Bonn Feds Forego Bounce

CK - Washington.   Fighting spam by ignoring rules: The Federal Agency for Security in Information Technology, BSI, advises government agencies to forego bounce messages which the internet-technology rules for receiving mail servers, RFCs 821 and 2821, require. As a result, mistyped addresses in communications to such agencies will not trigger an error message to the sender. A Heise investigation explains that the BSI action represents a response to spam. Spammers can fake email addresses and, through the bounce-notification system, can make recipients of spam believe the government would communicate with them when, in fact, the message originates from an unwanted source. According to Heise, Bonn-based BSI justifies its violation of the SMTP RFCs with the need to fight spam and virus-payloads, to keep government servers from becoming blacklisted on spam-fighting lists, to avoid having the general population confused by spam mails ostensibly originating with the government and to ignore a now-inappropriate standard conceived before the rise of spam. Some agencies accept mail with mistyped addresses, others simply drop it. Load and performance concerns do no…

» Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Spam , Bonn

Erschienen 22. September 2007 auf http://galj.info.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

heise: Starke Zunahme von Spam-Rückläufern (collateral spam)

spam-abwehren.de | 26. Mai 2008 — Der Onlinedienst heise berichtet über die daramtische Zunahme von sog. collateral spam, der bei Mißbrauch der E-Mail-Adresse des E…

Starke Zunahme von Spam-Rückläufern (collateral spam)

spam-abwehren.de | 26. Mai 2008 — Der Onlinedienst heise berichtet über die daramtische Zunahme von sog. collateral spam, der bei Mißbrauch der E-Mail-Adresse des E…

Interagency Notification

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 20. Dezember 2005 — CK - Washington.   Death and inheritance mean a lot of work not only for relatives, administrators and private sector parties, but…

Fees for Spam to Lawyer

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 20. Oktober 2006 — CK - Washington.   There is some debate in Germany whether lawyers may demand legal fees for the prosecution of their own claims. …

Rechtliche Fragen zu Spam-Filtern

ADVERSARIO | 4. Dezember 2004 — Wer auf Email-Kommunikation im geschäftlichen Bereich angewiesen ist und dazu noch seine Email-Adresse auf den geschäftlichen Inte…

FTC Approves New Rule Provision Under The CAN-SPAM Act

Handakte WebLAWg | 19. Mai 2008 — The Federal Trade Commission has approved four new rule provisions under the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornograp…

Spyware by Statute

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 1. September 2007 — CK - Washington.   Proposals by Wolfgang Schäuble, the German Secretary of the Interior, to restate and expand the jurisdiction of…

Mailorder Spam Liability

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 26. November 2005 — CK - Washington.   In a case reported to a German legal mailing list, Bert Handschumacher notes a new case extending contributory …

Diet Targets Privacy

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 22. Januar 2007 — CK - Washington.   On January 18, 2007, the Berlin parliament approved a draft statute, Telemediengesetz, to replace current statu…

Spam-Filtering: Wann dürfen Spam-Mails automatisch gelöscht werden

IT-Rechtsinfo | 24. Oktober 2009 — In einer Vielzahl von Unternehmen werden sogenannten DNS-Blacklists verwendet um die Unmengen von Spam automatisiert herauszufilte…

Startseite Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik
Berliner, Corcoran&Rowe
Wegbeschreibung zum BSI
heise online - Bounce-Verbot f�r Bundes-Mailserver