Avery Dennison verliert Streit um Domainnamen

Raising the bar on trademark protection, a U.S. federal appeals court has ruled that the Avery and Dennison trademarks of the office products company Avery Dennison Corp. are not famous enough to prevent another company from registering them with the .net domain. [...] To successfully claim trademark dilution, a company must prove that its trademark is famous, that the defendant is making a commercial use of the mark and that the use is likely to dilute the distinctive value of the trademark, among other things, the opinion said.

Que… » Vollständiger Artikel
  • Infos zum Artikel
  • Kommentare
  • Ähnliches
  • Links

Themen: Raising The Bar

Erschienen 7. November 2005 auf http://www.muepe.de/.

Sie haben eine Meinung zum Thema? Artikels kommentieren
Artikel kommentieren

Foreign Trademark Domestically Protected

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 26. Juli 2009 — CK - Washington.   Despite the fact that an unregistered trademark is used in Germany, a conflicting mark may be registered with t…

Man Arrested for 911 Phone Calls about Mom Taking His Beer

USA Recht | 12. Juni 2010 — Ungerechtfertigte 911 Notrufe ziehen in den USA Strafen nach sich. Legally Weird / Findlaw.com: In most cases, someone taking…

Beware the German Domain Rule

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 18. Juli 2008 — CK - Washington.   In the dim ages of the Internet, trademark law and domain law were two separate branches of the law. Trademark …

Adwords: No Trademark Issue

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 17. Juli 2011 — CK - Washington.   The German Supreme Court in Karlsruhe ruled on the question of trademarks used in search engine advertising sea…

USA: National Trademark Expo

MarkenBlog | 7. Januar 2008 — The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will host a showcase for trademarks at its Alexandria, Virginia headqua…

Domain is Property

German American Law Journal :: American Edition | 7. Januar 2005 — CK - Washington.   The domainundrecht.de blog analyzes the recent German Constitution Supreme Court decision, docket number 1 BVR …

Trademark Insider 1. Quartal

MarkenBlog | 1. Juli 2006 — Das US Unternehmen NAMEPROTECT hat den Trademark Insider mit Daten für das erste Quartal 2006 veröffentlicht. Die Publikation…

Heimbs Kaffee GmbH & Co. KG verliert UDRP-Verfahren um “allegretto.com”

muepe.de | weblog peter müller | 7. November 2011 — Der deutsche Kaffeehersteller Heimbs Kaffee GmbH & Co. KG, Tochter der Alois Dallmayr KG, ist im Wege des UDRP-Verfahrens…

Trademark Protection In The Global Marketplace

MarkenBlog | 19. September 2008 — But many companies stop there, thinking the job complete. It doesn’t occur to them that trademark rights are territorial and …

Keine Nestle Schuhe in Indien

MarkenBlog | 26. Februar 2007 — Der Delhi High Court hat einem lokalen Schuhproduzenten die Benutzung der Bezeichnung Nestle und des Nestle Logos untersagt. …

Avery Dennison Homepage

Avery Dennison is a global leader in pressure-sensitive technology and self-adhesive solutions.


CNN - Avery Dennison loses suit over trademark domains - August 26, 1999
Document: 9th Circuit Opinion in Avery Dennison Cybersquatting Case, 8/23/99.

Opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Avery Dennison Corp. v. Jerry Sumpton, a case pertaining to cybersquatting and trademark dilution, August 23, 1999.


Story: 9th Circuit Rules in Avery Dennison Domain Name Trademark Case, 8/25/99.

Tech Law Journal story about the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decision in Avery Dennison Corp. v. Jerry Sumpton, a case pertaining to cybersquatting and trademark dilution, August 25, 1999.