Top EU Court to rule on transparency of EU judiciary tomorrow

von Patrick Breyer

17. Juli 2017

Just how transparent are EU court proceedings? Are the press and the public given access to pleadings in important landmark cases? Or do parties face a fine when disclosing pleadings to the press or the public? In an action brought by the German civil liberties activist and pirate party member Patrick Breyer, the EU Court of Justice (ECJ) will deliver its judgement concerning these issues tomorrow (Commission vs. Breyer, C-213/15 P).[1]

As the ECJ does not grant access to written submissions, Breyer asked the Commission to disclose Austrian pleadings concerning the non-transposition of the controversial EU Data Retention Directive. The Court of First Instance ruled in favour of Breyer and the Commission disclosed the pleadings[2] but filed an appeal against the judgement. It is not only asking the ECJ to repeal the judgement but also to fine Breyer for publishing all written submissions in the present case on his homepage.[3]

“The EU‘s judicial system is lacking transparency. This intransparency fosters mistrust instead of building trust in times of the EU experiencing a crisis of acceptance. Justice needs openness”, explains Breyer his aims.

“The EU‘s top court should not be conducting secret proceedings. Transparency is especially needed where instruments of mass surveillance and fundamental rights and freedoms are at stake. The validity of such interferences in our private lives is of interest to every one of us ...

Zum vollständigen Artikel


Cookies helfen bei der Bereitstellung unserer Dienste. Durch die Nutzung erklären Sie sich mit der Cookie-Setzung einverstanden. Mehr OK