ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION
Frosch Sportreisen GmbH v. E. A.
Case No. D2012-0577
1. The Parties
Complainant is Frosch Sportreisen GmbH of Münster, Germany, represented by Res Media, Kanzlei für IT und Medienrecht, Germany.
Respondent is E. A. of Izmir, Turkey.
2. The Domain Name and Registrar
The disputed domain name is registered with PSI-USA, Inc. dba Domain Robot (the “Registrar”).
3. Procedural History
The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on March 20, 2012. On March 21, 2012, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. On the same date, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint.
Complainant filed an amendment to the Complaint on March 21, 2012 providing the registrant and contact information disclosed by the Registrar.
The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amendment to the Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).
On March 28, 2012, the Center received an email communication in German from Respondent providing arguments against the Complaint filed against it. Respondent filed said arguments in English on April 2, 2012.
On April 2, 2012, the Center received an email communication from Complainant in response to Respondent’s arguments ...Zum vollständigen Artikel